Recently I came across this blog post (https://winteryknight.com/2019/06/11/william-lane-craig-lectures-on-the-evidence-for-the-resurrection-of-jesus-9/) purporting that the resurrection has a wide array of support amongst historians, and that several facts are largely agreed on that would rule out other explanations. Those being Jesus' burial in a stone tomb, his disappearance, and his appearance post-mortem to people who would then preach his revival. Is this an accurate summary of the current state of Resurrection scholarship, or is there some nuance missing?
While you wait for an answer to your specific question, you may enjoy reading this answer from the FAQ, on the evidence for or against the existence of Jesus Christ by u/DearCubusSan. While that answer is 5 years old, there is not to my knowledge any new scholarship that fundamentally changes the answer given there.