With common thinking being WWI tactics were outdated compared to the technology of the time, has there been a modern review into a more optimum way to approach warfare of the time? Would different tactics have made a substantial difference to the outcome of the war?

by ozzyburger
jonewer

Not to discourage any new answers and lord knows more can be written on the subject, but I wrote a little bit about tactics here which partly answers your question, and also another answer on technological innovations here.

In short, no, tactics were largely a product of and by extension limited by the available technology. Tactical innovations developed hand in hand with technological innovations, with the additional constraints of gearing up for mass production of these new technologies, as well as the discovery (often through trial and error), and promulgation of the new doctrines that allowed mass armies to leverage said technology.

Thus the 'common thinking' is somewhat detached from reality.