Since the Second Amendment originally only referred to regulated militias right to bear arms in order to oppose a tyrannical government, were cannons included in that right?

by Knightmare25

Assuming a militias purpose was to defend against a military, cannons were something a military had, so were militias allowed to own cannons?

TripRoberto

A previous thread with multiple answers covers this pretty well (I highly suggest reading) but the short answer is yes.

Edit: forgot to give credit to u/Evan_Th and u/freedmenspatrol for their answers