Is Hannah Arendt's "Origins of totallitarianism" considered controversial amongst historians? If so what are the most popular criticisms or counterarguments against the paper (particularly on chapter 13"Idealogy and terror a novel form of government"?)

by Indominus_Khanum

I'm currently studying the similiarities and differences between the role of terror/social engineering and xenophobia , in both Idealogy and execution in the USSR (under Stalin ) and Nazi Germany for a school project ( this the IBDP history IA if anyone's familiar with it).

One part of this project involves me analyzing two key sources(secondary or primary) on my topic . One of the sources that I picked up was the "Origins of totallitarianism" by Hannah Arendt and I was wondering if there was a paper that was similiar in significance but arguing against/ taking a different line of thinking on comparing Stalinism and Nazism. I don't know how exactly do primary sources factor into a debate like this but if there are any famous ones that are often sites in these discussions I'd like to know about them as well!

Klesk_vs_Xaero

While there's room for further discussion, especially concerning your main point of interest, this previous answer by /u/commiespaceinvader deals with certain controversial aspects of Arendt's work.