Sorry I fucked up the title.... x_x
So i've seen countless threads online arguing about the Superiority of the Bow over the Musket. Some points being superior accuracy, range, fire rate, and durability.
Another beaten horse that ive seen is the extremely common quotation about Ben Franklin writing to Charles Lee on how they should equip some continental soldiers with Bows = https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-22-02-0207
Yet why would the Bow wielding Native Americans adopt European Muskets if Bows were indeed so superior to Firearms?
The short and simple answer is that the premise is incorrect. The arquebus, once it was introduced, outperformed bows and crossbows in almost every respect. See:
/u/Valkine's answer to Why were primitive firearms used when bows and crossbows were better in every way?; and
Pre-empting questions of Asian comparisons, /u/Searocksandtrees compiled a list of links which you may find of use.