All Royal Navy ships in the days of sail carried fishing gear, including tackle and lines as well as trawl and seine nets. And it was policy to encourage fishing wherever it was practicable.
There’s an important distinction to be made between preserved fish and fresh fish. In the early days, salted fish was a standard part of ship’s provisions. Samuel Pepys, who worked for the Navy Board, wrote victualing contracts for navy ships dating from the 1670’s, which mention fish being served 3 days a week (Wednesdays, Fridays and Saturdays) in the form of “salt cod or hake”. But this practice was abandoned around the 1730’s, for several reasons:
The situation was different for fresh fish, which the sailors enjoyed. The biggest thing in its favor was that you could get fresh fish while at sea, whereas all other meats came preserved from a barrel (or from cans, after canning became popular in the mid 19th century). Fresh fish made a nice change from preserved foods. In fact, it was Royal Navy policy (also mentioned in the Hornblower books) to not mess with enemy fishing boats. Instead, navy ships would stop and buy fresh fish from them, and possibly extract any useful military information if their captains could be bribed or fooled into revealing it.
As for doing their own fishing, it was common enough but difficult. Most of the open ocean is actually a desert, there aren’t many fish around. Fishing spots are usually in coastal waters, or in special areas where there are submerged undersea mountains that cause upwelling of the currents. But coastal waters were dangerous, enemy ships might be close by, and you don’t want to be caught towing a net when they chase you.
The war mission took precedence of course, but navy ships did stop and fish when they could. And on the open ocean you can still sometimes find bonito or porpoises following your boats, or sharks, or flying fish. All of these were caught and eaten as opportunity presented.
But fresh fish were insufficient to feed the crew on a regular basis. They were not counted as part of daily rations, they were treated as a surplus over and above the day’s ration. That’s one reason why fishing isn’t often mentioned in ships’ logs. It was something of an extra-curricular activity. There were guidelines on what to do with the limited catch. It went to the sickbay first, then any remainder was distributed among the crew.
Most of this information is from the book Feeding Nelson's Navy: The True Story of Food at Sea in the Georgian Era by Janet MacDonald.
Partial answer here, but a seine net was commonly issued in the Royal Navy in the previous century (and requests for them date back to the mid 17th century). Joseph Banks' journal for the 4th of September 1769 on board the Endevour records that Māori
after having a little laught at our seine, which was a common kings seine, shewd us one of theirs which was 5 fathom deep and its lengh we could only guess, as it was not stretchd out, but it could not from its bulk be less than 4 or 500 fathom.
The reference to a "king's seine" is obviously intended to convey information about the size to his readers, but I don't know the usual dimensions. He has plenty of other references in his journals to using the net, but none to the size (aside from saying that they caught '50 to 200 lb of fish in a tide' while in New South Wales). As a scientist he was of course interested in the catches, and also used a smaller 'cast net' (which one of servants ended up losing overboard) shot birds and caught seaweed. The men also used fishing rods.
For further information I'd probably try Anne Salmond's 'Two Worlds' or maybe Beaglehole's edition of Cook's journals.