Why did the United States h-bomb Japanese CITIES instead of less populated Japanese land?

by P-Tux7

Like, wouldn't bombing the boonies or mountains or a small island still send the required fear effect to the Japanese government without as much civilian casualties?

jschooltiger

Hi, this question gets asked here a lot. You may be interested in these sections of our FAQ:

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/wiki/faq/militaryhistory/wwii/usa#wiki_the_atomic_bombs.2C_aka_questions_.2Fu.2Frestricteddata_has_answered

and

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/wiki/faq/militaryhistory/wwii/usa#wiki_atomic_bomb_targeting

and in particular these threads:

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1imao2/during_the_decision_to_create_the_atomic_bomb_was/cb601we/

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2todt6/did_the_us_have_to_nuke_japan_in_wwii/co17rtk/

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/a0wnxa/why_werent_the_bombings_of_hiroshima_and_nagasaki/eal9118/

Just to clear up a minor misconception in the question text: "H-bombs" are hydrogen bombs, or thermonuclear weapons, which are a type of weapon developed after the end of WWII. The bombs that struck Hiroshima and Nagasaki were first-generation atomic bombs.