Just to clarify, I'm fully aware that this guy is a peddler.
While Lyndall Ryan according to this comment is still doing some sort of research that accumulates evidence of British-Aboriginal Conflict following Windschuttle's books on Australian History, while the latest one Keith has done was "uncovering the agenda" of an aboriginal state taking up 60% of Australia land. Something ridiculous like that.
On the otherhand, the debate on the details since the 1997 report have been criticize by other debates within Australia's greater "History War", so I am curious if any other books on the issue came out since that addressed them.
Given how turbulent this topic is, I imagine some recent book as at least a chapter on the matter. A large book on the matter of Settler-Native interactions for Australia that includes it would be great as well if it is an option.
The book Whitewash: On Keith Windschuttle's Fabrication of Aboriginal History edited by Robert Manne, published in 2003, relatively shortly after Windschuttle's The Fabrication Of Aboriginal History, Volume One, contains chapters by numerous historians from Henry Reynolds to Marilyn Lake to Shayne Breen specifically engaging with/debunking Windschuttle's claims more generally.
In terms of 'a large book on the matter of Settler-Native interactions', /u/djiti-djiti's recently overhauled the Australia part of the Oceania booklist here on /r/AskHistorians, and that has several suggestions that would likely suit you, including Australian Frontier Wars: 1788-1838 by John Connor (2012).
As to historians addressing Windschuttle's 2010 The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, Volume Three: The Stolen Generations, there really isn't much. Bessant's 2012 article in Policy Studies is the only academic article on that topic that I can see on Google Scholar which refers to Windschuttle's book at any length. But I think it's fair to say that, at this point, most historians aren't engaging with Windschuttle any more in the pages of academic journals, seeing him as more or less a crank - and because the current Australian government isn't as enthusiastic about Windschuttle as the Howard government was, he doesn't have the institutional standing that he might have had in 2003.