Why does medieval and early modern art look so... bad?

by Pashahlis

Compare for example this from 1885: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wernerprokla.jpg/1280px-Wernerprokla.jpg

To this from about 1200: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/11/Otto_I_Manuscriptum_Mediolanense_c_1200.jpg

And there are many more such examples from different time frames.

jschooltiger

This question gets asked here all the time:

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/wiki/art#wiki_visual_arts

These threads in particular might be of interest to you:

https://my.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/35do0x/why_do_people_in_medieval_art_look_bored_or/cr3jaff/

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1ttglu/why_did_it_take_so_long_for_artists_to_get_to/cebgxjy/

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/5mtzw3/why_do_professional_paintings_look_photorealistic/dc7nbik/

The short version is that photorealism isn't always the goal of art, and that what was valued in different places around the world in different time periods was, well, different.