For the most part in the bronze and iron age said political entities were either kingdoms or tribes but never city states. What's the explanation for this?
I'm sorry, I'd love to help but I'm not sure I understand exactly what you're asking. It's hard to answer the question why communities didn't adopt certain forms of organisation, especially in a period for which we have no narrative histories. Are you asking why the city-state did not emerge sooner? Or how Bronze Age lords managed to dominate their communities? Or why the city-state as a common Greek form of political organisation only arose when it did, centuries after the Bronze Age?
I should point out that the concept of the "city-state" is very muddled and confusing, and some scholars no longer use it to describe the polities of the Greek world, since it hurts more than it helps. I wrote about the problems with the term here. Also, in all periods of its history, Greece saw many different kinds of state organisation, some of which I've outlined here; both kingdoms and tribal groups existed in Greece in what we consider to be the age of the city-state. I hope these posts can help answer some of your questions.