I read a bit of the articles and listened to a few of the podcast and thought it was very well done. It wasn’t until recently, however, that I read that 1619 isn’t completely historically accurate. The article saying this was from a right leaning news source and the main historian it quoted seemed to be right leaning as well (I couldn’t find the article when I went beach and looked for it for this post). So my question is, is there any truth to the claim that 1619 is historically ill informed or wrong?
Additional discussion is always welcome, but you may also be interested in the past discussion on this topic in the question A piece from the New York Times '1619 Project' claims that the Declaration of Independence was written in part to preserve the institution of slavery. Can this be verified? featuring responses from /u/red_galiray and /u/secessionisillegal.