I know that podcasts should be seen as entertainment rather than a proper source of knowledge, but I still wonder how much he gets wrong/right.
While trying to see if anyone asked about it on AH before, I've found a question regarding Duncan's book, with answer leaving me skeptical with Duncan's content as a whole.
At the same time, he does seem to focus mostly on laying out the events rather than giving his own analysis, and he tends to spend a lot of time on each revolution in question.
But still, I've realized that for many of those events I basically knew nothing at all before listening to his podcast, so it would be nice to know whether I can regard this knowledge as accurate.
Hi there!
Your question doesn't break any rules, and we're happy to let it stand. However, we'd warn you that it can be difficult to get an answer for this kind of query. Unless a knowledgable user happens to already listen to this podcast and can critique it, it's generally unlikely that anyone will be in a position to engage with it holistically. It can be more fruitful to ask about specific claims - if there is something that they've said that you aren't sure about, asking about that is more likely to get a response. You are welcome to ask more than one question if need be.