Why did the Aztecs not undergo a demographic crisis with the number of people they were sacrificing?

by Massive_swim

The 1487 dedication of the Templo Mayor in Tenochtitlan famously had 80400 sacrifices, or one every 4 seconds. While I know that many historians have claimed that these figures are exaggerated, partly by the Aztecs themselves as a way of appearing more frightening and also by the Spaniards to accentuate their brutality, it is unlikely that the figures are wildly far off. Even taking the smallest reasonable estimates leads to thousands of sacrifices each year, the equivalent of the population of a good-sized town in their realm. Is there any record of anyone ever expressing worry over this before the Spanish?

AncientHistory

Hey there,

Just to let you know, your question is fine, and we're letting it stand. However, you should be aware that questions framed as 'Why didn't X do Y' relatively often don't get an answer that meets our standards (in our experience as moderators). There are a few reasons for this. Firstly, it often can be difficult to prove the counterfactual: historians know much more about what happened than what might have happened. Secondly, 'why didn't X do Y' questions are sometimes phrased in an ahistorical way. It's worth remembering that people in the past couldn't see into the future, and they generally didn't have all the information we now have about their situations; things that look obvious now didn't necessarily look that way at the time.

If you end up not getting a response after a day or two, consider asking a new question focusing instead on why what happened did happen (rather than why what didn't happen didn't happen) - this kind of question is more likely to get a response in our experience. Hope this helps!