I often see in this sub the warning that this or that writer is an "orientalist" and it's clearly a bad tag. Why is it so?
Also, I guess there are different shades of Orientalism? After all, an orientalist deciphered the Egyptian hieroglyphs and another one prompted modern linguistics with a simple, insightful observation.
Aren't many of them just a bit overenthusiastic Enlightened scholars?
There was a good Monday Methods thread addressing Said and Orientalism a while back. The intro by u/commiespaceinvader does an excellent job of summarizing the problems with Orientalism:
βThe essence of Said's argument in Orientalism is that the representation of "the Orient" in Western art, culture, and academia β the Western knowledge of the Eastern world β is not based upon an objective exercise of intellectual inquiry but upon a fictional depiction in the form of an intellectual exercise in self-affirmation. It is a system of thought that in the words of Said "approaches a heterogeneous, dynamic, and complex human reality from an uncritically essentialist standpoint; this suggests both an enduring Oriental reality and an opposing no less enduring Western essence".β