Ok dumb question but

by meurglys90

Why didn’t countries in Asia just build factories and guns to compete with the west? I’ll admit I slept through a lot of the class since I had it first period but I’m in AP euro and we learned that Otto got fucked since he had open market policies and when Europe was pumping out goods with colonial resources and manufactorie his local traders were outcompeted and unemployment skyrocketed. Like in AP US history they tell us we just stole the factory model from GB even though he tried to hide it, why didn’t other countries do that? And why didn’t Asian countries try to colonize if they knew about the new world? And why were they lacking in military tech, why couldn’t they just capture a dude and get the tactics from him or kill a dude and reverse engineer his stuff. Like the arabs learned paper making from the Chinese after the battle of talas river and richtugese monks smuggled silk works out of China in their monk canes right

ReaperReader

When you speak of an Otto who had open market policies, can you state the Asian country involved? Is this a reference to the Ottoman empire?

Also I'm not clear of what time period you are thinking of, is it the 16th to 18th centuries as Europe was exploring, colonising and settling the Americas, or was it more the 18th-19th centuries as the Industrial Revolution was starting in England and then spreading to Belgium and Germany?

Also you may be interested in a previous comment of mine where I present the arguments and evidence that colonialisation was bad for the economy of the colonising country (relative to free-ish, peaceful-ish, trade).