Did the unification of Japan improve the living standards of the Japanese peasantry?

by Full-Yellow

For example standardisation of laws and taxes and the end to wars between daimyo

ParallelPain

The founding of the Edo Bakufu did not standardize laws and taxes. Bakufu law takes precedence for country-wide things, like outlawing Christianity and no building ships that were too big. Otherwise domains set their own laws. Here are the laws for:

Likewise taxes weren't standardized, at least not in the proportion collected. The on-paper taxes were usually 40% or 50% of rice production, but some domains at one time or another had as high as 70% or 80%. By the way, in reality this is not as high as it looks. There were a lot of exemptions, which cut tax for the Bakufu realm down from 50% on paper to around 30~40% in the 18th century. Plus the tax is only on rice, which according to early Meiji figures made up of on average 50~60% of cereal production by weight. If this figure is used, then the actual tax rate by weight of cereal (not monetary value) is usually 15%~25%.

But to answer the question, from what we can tell the answer is almost without a doubt yes. Though we have little to no records the farmers wrote themselves, there are other data we have.

Taking the data from Japan’s Medieval Population by William Wayne Faris, here are various estimates for Japan.

Year Population Estimate Average Annual Growth Rate Arable Land Rice Yield
Millions % Per Year since previous period Pre-Tokugawa Chō % Change Tokugawa Koku/Tan % Change
1280 5.7-6.5 977,000 0.85
1450 9.6-10.5 0.2-0.23 1,241,379 27% 1.23 45%
1600 15-17 0.225-0.32* 1,588,462 28% 0.955 -22%
1721 31.3 0.51 2,251,539 42% 1.094 15%

*Using the figure of 10.5 million in 1450 and 17 million in 1600, Faris says that the growth rate would be 0.3% per year, but on calculation it should be 0.32% so maybe Faris just rounded it down. Faris also notes the possibility of pushing the 0.51% growth per year back to 1550. In that case by my calculations the population growth between 1450 and 1550 would’ve been 0.225% per year, and the population in 1550 roughly 13.2 million.

Either way the transition to the Edo saw a considerable increase in population growth. Which must have meant a marked increase in life-expectancy and decrease in infant mortality. Abortion and infanticide, which Jesuit Luis Frois noted was very common in the Sengoku, must have also decreased as family can now feed more offspring. There was already a large effort to open up new farms in the late Sengoku, but the peace of the Edo must have made things much smoother now there were no risk of marauding armies “asking” for provisions, competing lords demanding taxes, warriors kidnapping villagers as hostages, stealing and burning crops, markets, and homes, and bandits attacking wherever there’s an opportunity. A common thing in the Sengoku was that things were so bad the farmers often abandoned (at least temporarily) their fields and fled into the hills, and many joined armies just to get enough to eat. And now that war wasn’t a thing, manpower could be devoted to production.

See here on a quick summary of what marauding armies did to the people. If we take a look at the disease and famine data below (also from Faris), we can see that famine and disease often coincided with each other and also with warfare. This is not a surprise as the disruption of agriculture must have played a large part in food shortages, and malnutrition of course made people’s immune system weaker. So war led to famine and disease which led to more war. There's even strong evidence that daimyōs specifically went on campaign when there's famine at home in order to feed their people off their enemies. Some scholars also believe the weather might have caused problems between 1450 and 1550, though it’s apparently debated whether it was worse than the previous. Even without taking the weather into account, we can see the Kyōtoku War coinciding with the Kanshō famine in the late 1450s, with famine again rearing its head in the Onin War, and the breakdown of social order following the Meiō Coup coinciding with the worst period between 1490 and 1520. Afterwards, the consolidation of small lords and local warfare into bigger, more stable domains until finally unification coincided with ever decreasing mention of famine and disease in the records.

Year Disease Famine
1450
1451
1452 Smallpox
1453 Smallpox
1454
1455 Widespread
1456 Local
1457
1458
1459 Widespread
1460 Widespread
1461 Widespread
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466 Widespread
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471 Measles
1472 Widespread
1473 Local
1474
1475 Local
1476 Local
1477 Smallpox Widespread
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482 Local
1483
1484 Measles Local
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489 Measles Local
1490 Local
1491
1492 Widespread
1493
1494 Local
1495 Smallpox Local
1496 Local
1497 Local
1498 Widespread
1499 Widespread
1500 Local
1501 Widespread
1502 Widespread
1503 Widespread
1504 Widespread
1505 Widespread
1506 Measles Widespread
1507
1508
1509
1510 Local
1511 Widespread
1512 Widespread
1513 Measles Widespread
1514 Local
1515 Local
1516 Local
1517 Widespread
1518 Widespread
1519 Widespread
1520 Measles & Influenza
1521
1522
1523 Smallpox Local
1524
1525 Smallpox Widespread
1526
1527
1528 Local
1529 Measles
1530
1531 Smallpox
1532 Smallpox Local
1533
1534 Local
1535 Influenza Widespread
1536 Local
1537 Smallpox
1538 Local
1539
1540 Widespread
1541 Local
1542 Local
1543
1544 Local
1545 Local
1546 Local
1547 Local
1548
1549
1550 Smallpox Local
1551 Local
1552 Local
1553
1554
1555
1556 Influenza Local
1557 Measles & Smallpox Widespread
1558 Local
1559
1560
1561
1562 Local
1563 Local
1564
1565 Local
1566 Local
1567 Local
1568
1569
1570
1571 Smallpox
1572
1573 Widespread
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578 Measles
1579
1580
1581
1582 Local
1583
1584
1585 Widespread
1586
1587 Measles
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593 Unknown
1594 Unknown Local
1595
1596
1597
1598 Local
1599 Local