I've just been rejected for a pair of PhD opportunities I applied for, and when I have suggested topics to Universities, specific historians or research councils i've always been told "nice idea but it needs to be funded"
Beginning to lose hope! I'm in the UK and specialise currently in modern history and Wales.
My PhD (in Canada) was fully funded by the university for a set period of time...I think it was 5 years, but we could apply for extra funding if we didn't finish after 5 years, so really I think the limit was 7 years. We also had to do other jobs for the university, either teaching or research assistants. But the idea was that as a PhD student, we were actually employees of the university, so full funding was sort of the equivalent of a salary.
I'm not sure if it works that way at every university, but I've definitely heard that in the UK a PhD isn't always automatically funded. Whenever people in the UK ask about this, the answer is always "absolutely do not start a PhD if it's not fully funded". You should be compensated for your labour, and that includes your research! A university will benefit from your presence and your work, both now and in the future, and if they aren't willing to fund you then you shouldn't go there.