The general narrative around Alexander seems to be that he's a unique, heroic military genius who pursued conquest as its own end. But that feels wrong, if only because it sounds like an extremely uncritical example of great-man history.
What social and/or economic factors compelled Macedon, a smallish regional power, to expand over vast swathes of land? And what forbade or dissuaded similar powers from doing so as well?
Hi, you may be interested in this older answer by /u/Iphikrates, which discusses the historical (and political/cultural) background of Macedon and Alexander's choice of conquests.