For example, one of those siblings would become the crown prince and heir to the throne, and sometimes this was pre-determined as early as childhood. So what was the dynamic like between a prepubescent or adolescent crown prince and his siblings, especially brothers, of similar ages? Was he compelled or encouraged to establish an air of aloofness and dominance over his brothers? Or were the rules not that strict, and he was able to engage in playing and "rough-housing" with his brothers as relative equals (up until he reaches adulthood, of course)? If the childhood power dynamic was relatively informal and relaxed, how did that affect the dynamic once all the siblings reach adulthood?
The answer may very well be as simple as "Yes, crown princes were allowed to have a normal childhood with their siblings". I just want to make sure.
Sorry, we don't allow "example seeking" questions. It's not that your question was bad; it's that these kinds of questions tend to produce threads that are collections of disjointed, partial, inadequate responses. If you have a question about a specific historical event, period, or person, feel free to rewrite your question and submit it again. If you don't want to rewrite it, you might try submitting it to /r/history, /r/askhistory, or /r/tellmeafact.
For further explanation of the rule, feel free to consult this META thread.