We know that Nazi Germany had stockpiles of first-ever nerve agents, sarin and tabun.
We also know that preventive civil defence measures that all countries introduced against WW1-era toxins would have been useless against nerve agents.
The decision-making process that led to Hitler deciding not to deploy nerve toxins is also well understood.
What I could not find is any kind of analysis of effects a decision to resort to using nerve toxins in the desperate late-war stage. For instance, if V-1s were used to deliver sarin and tabun instead of explosives to London. What would a single warhead with a tonne of nerve agents do? Would they disperse? Would they remain in one place?
We can assume a more concentrated initial campaign, as trying to achieve initial surprise makes more sense for nerve toxins than for high explosives. So, spring 1944, about 200 launches a day, 100 of which strike London each day for a week.
Sorry, but your submission has been removed because we don't allow hypothetical questions. If possible, please feel free to rephrase the question so that it does not call for such speculation, and resubmit. Otherwise, this sort of thing is better suited for /r/HistoryWhatIf. You can find a more in-depth discussion of this rule here.