Places like Brazil and Cuba had to continuously bring people over from Africa, whereas America by 1850 had about 2x more slaves than Brazil. I think the Bahamas was the only other place that also had natural growth, is that true?
I'm afraid I don't have the time right this second to give you a fresh answer, but I wrote an answer some years ago to a follow-up question in another thread about how misleading the idea of 'natural growth' is in discussions of transatlantic slavery when comparing region to region, focusing on the British Caribbean. You can find it here and I think it will go some way to helping you understand the regional differences at play and their significance.