Are the writings of Graham Hancock on the antiquity of the Egyptian pyramids and Sphinx legitimate or is it him trying to enforce a false/made-up narrative?
This might be a very stupid question but I am an outsider looking in on this topic and his arguments sound convincing. Hence thought it would be better to ask it here. Thank you.
Graham Hancock is not regarded with any seriousness by academics. More can always be said if anyone's got the inclination to point out why nobody should be listening to him; for the meantime, as he's been asked about before, I commend to your attention a previous collection of why Hancock is not to be trusted, as gathered by u/Bentresh.