There is a tendency to label the situation in India in 1856-57 as an Indian Rebellion or Sepoy mutiny in International historical discussions as opposed to what it is regarded in India i.e. Indian Revolution against the British rule (although it was still controlled by the British East India Company).

Although it seems a trivial question, the difference in rebellion or revolution does matter as to the intent of those involved. It was clear that the aims of a majority of the princes and movers involved was to " overthrow and destroy the oppressing power, as well as its accompanying laws " i.e. a revolution and not just to "evade and/or gain concessions from an oppressive power" i.e. a rebellion.

The Indian revolution of 1857 was not a well planned out movement but it was widespread enough and caused enough fear in the British government to actually abolish company rule and further finally reformat the government as an Empire of India. Also it lead to pretty much a complete overhaul of rules and laws allowing greater participation of Indians in the civil services.

It would be really great if someone could clarify and answer this question and the historical lens for looking at the 1857 events in India.