I've got some books of Anthony Beevor (The second world War, the Ardennes and Stalingrad) and have the following questions:
How reliable is Anthony Beevor? What is his perspective, and potential bias? What do I have to have in the back of my head whilst reading his works?
I hope that this is not against the rules. It is not my intention to break them.
There is always more to say, but the question of Beevor's focus and reliability has come up a few times here before, and you might like to review this thread, led by u/DanKensington, while you wait for fresh responses to your query.