It seems as though black boxers were accepted much sooner than black athletes in most other sports. Is my perception correct, and if so, why was this the case?

by CarnalKid

I just saw a FB post about Jackie Robinson's birthday, and realized that Jack Johnson was already dead when Robinson broke the color barrier in baseball, Joe Louis had been HW champ for quite some time leading up to that as well, etc.

So, am I correct in thinking black boxers were accepted sooner? If so, does anybody have any idea why that is? It occurs to me that boxers are frequently seen as dumb and violent, which fits with certain unfortunate stereotypes, but I'd love to hear a historical take on the issue.

Hard_Taco_Tuesday

According to Frederick Douglass slaves would often be encouraged to fight and wrestle for sport because it’d keep them tired and fight off the “spirit of insurrection.” This led to some level of organized boxing matches and gambling rings between slaves. In 1810, Tom Molineaux, after he earned his freedom and $100,000 for his former master in a fight against another slave, fought for the Heavyweight Title in London.

Actual historians with a depth of knowledge could add a lot more context and examples but I think it was something slave owners were generally ok with and profiting from in the first place, and it became a sensational thing in the rest of the anglosphere decades before the civil war. It probably drew bigger crowds to see Africans or African-American Freedmen fight just for the novelty factor, it likely didn’t anger abolitionists, and it was making slavers a bunch of money.

Sports like baseball developed later in the reconstruction and segregation eras and leagues and organizations built around those policies, while black people had been grandfathered into boxing for generations. At least in sensational cases it was a way for them to literally “fight for freedom.”