Nathan Bedford Forrest, founder of the 1st KKK, seems like an extremely weird and contradictory person. Can someone help clarify portions of his Wikipedia article?

by J2quared

Full article

The portion below from the article is strange to me, can someone help clarify:

[Differences with Southern white majority](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Bedford_Forrest#Differences_with_Southern_white_majority_(1870s)

"After the lynch mob murder of four blacks who had been arrested for defending themselves in a brawl at a barbecue, Forrest wrote to Tennessee Governor John C. Brown in August 1874 and "volunteered to help 'exterminate' those men responsible for the continued violence against the blacks", offering "to exterminate the white marauders who disgrace their race by this cowardly murder of Negroes".[125]

On July 5, 1875, Forrest gave a speech before the Independent Order of Pole-Bearers Association, a post-war organization of black Southerners advocating to improve the economic condition of blacks and to gain equal rights for all citizens. At this, his last public appearance, he made what The New York Times described as a "friendly speech"[173][174] during which, when offered a bouquet of flowers by a young black woman, he accepted them,[175] thanked her and kissed her on the cheek. Forrest spoke in encouragement of black advancement and of endeavoring to be a proponent for espousing peace and harmony between black and white Americans.[176]

In response to the Pole-Bearers speech, the Cavalry Survivors Association of Augusta, the first Confederate organization formed after the war, called a meeting in which Captain F. Edgeworth Eve gave a speech expressing strong disapproval of Forrest's remarks promoting inter-ethnic harmony, ridiculing his faculties and judgment and berating the woman who gave Forrest flowers as "a mulatto wench". The association voted unanimously to amend its constitution to expressly forbid publicly advocating for or hinting at any association of white women and girls as being in the same classes as "females of the negro race".[177][178] The Macon Weekly Telegraph newspaper also condemned Forrest for his speech, describing the event as "the recent disgusting exhibition of himself at the negro jamboree" and quoting part of a Charlotte Observer article, which read "We have infinitely more respect for Longstreet, who fraternizes with negro men on public occasions, with the pay for the treason to his race in his pocket, than with Forrest and [General] Pillow, who equalize with the negro women, with only 'futures' in payment" "

tombomp

Specifically on the issue of the speech, /u/Georgy_K_Zhukov has talked about it as still a white supremacist position, even if some saw it as not white supremacist enough https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/hmaesx/comment/fx58mrq?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=comment_timestamp