I understand that proponents of "Free silver" believed that by putting more silver into circulation their money would be inflated and make the nation prosperous. But how would inflating their currency be a good thing? Also, how would it be inflated if there was hard money in circulation. I think I am misunderstanding inflation. When I hear the word I think of Iranian currency or the Weimar republics currency.
Also, I want to know what the consensus on the movement is now. Were these people misguided? If we had kept the silver standard would we be as rich as we are today?
The basic outline is as follows:
To expand on the last point, you hear the word "inflation" and you think of circumstances like Weimar or Zimbabwe. Those are fairly extreme examples. Some inflation, many mainstream economists argue, is likely natural. There is considerable disagreement about how much is natural, desirable, or when government should deliberately pursue inflationary policy (including this so as not to advocate for a particular economic view, which could derail this thread). Small inflationary pressures usually do not present a major problem while the economy and population are growing. The counterpart, deflation, however, is almost always a runaway disaster and was a principal cause of economic woes prior to the end of World War II. As prices fall, businesses cut back on production, and either cut wages or lay off workers. The workers, in turn, lose their spending power, driving demand down further, and continuing the deflationary spiral.
Further reading (for a historical view of Free Silver and history of economic depressions, not necessarily a deep-dive into academic Economics):
Charles Postel, The Populist Vision
Eric Rauchway, The Great Depression: A Very Short Introduction