I am a Danish trader in the 10th century. I mostly keep to the Atlantic, up and down the coast and maybe out to the British Isles if there's opportunity. How common a sight are whales? Do they have any special significance to me?

by JoeFlat

I assume populations were larger, but were sightings more common? What superstitions might a peaceful Dane attach to them? Any practical use for a sighting? My understanding is that whaling was starting to be a thing, but not much of an industry yet. I'm curious what non-viking Scandinavians of the "Viking Age" thought anout these great monsters of the ocean.

y_sengaku

My understanding is that whaling was starting to be a thing, but not much of an industry yet.

I basically agree to your understanding, and I have to apologize in advance that to estimate the historical (especially pre-1500) population of whales in the North sea region as well as the frequency of their sight is beyond my ability.

+++

Ælfric's Colloquy, a Latin textbook for the monks written by Abbot of Eynsham about a thousand years ago in the midst of the Late Viking Age England, indeed mention the interesting passage on the fishing and possible commercial whaling:

  • Teacher: What do you catch in the sea?
  • Fisherman: I catch herring, salmon, dolphins, sturgeon, oysters, crabs, mussels, cockles, flatfish, plaice, lobsters and such like.
  • Teacher: Would you like to catch a whale?
  • Fisherman: No, I don’t think so.
  • Teacher: Why not?
  • Fisherman: Because catching whales is a dangerous business. I find it is far safer for me to go to the river with my spear than to go to the sea with many ships to hunt whales.
  • Teacher: Why is that?
  • Fisherman: Because it is better for me to catch fish than to kill a more powerful one, as it could drown and kill with one blow, not only me but my friends as well.
  • Teacher: But many men catch whales and escape danger, as well as obtaining a large price for their catch.
  • Fisherman: You speak the truth but I would not dare sail on account of my fears.

(ll. 61-70, the translation is taken from:Ælfric's Colloquy, trans. Ann E. Watkins)

On the other hand, Norwegian Ohthere (usually rendered as Ottar in modern Norwegian)'s account on the coastal life of northernmost part of Norway is another 10th century evidence of whaling in the North Sea:

'......the best whale hunting is in his [Ohthere's] own land: they [whales] are forty-eight ells long and the biggest fifty ells long; he [Ohthere] said that he and six others killed sixty of them is two days' (Translation is taken from: Nordeide & Edwards 2019: 10).

These two accounts are all of the contemporary written evidence of whales and possible whaling in the Viking Age Northern seas. Norwegian and Icelandic lawbooks are often cited as evidence of drifted whales in the Viking Ages, but they were firstly written in the 12th century or further later (the manuscript is dated to the middle of the 13th century).

Nevertheless, while neither of the texts allude to the concrete use of which body part of the whale, it is worth noting that both texts suggest the whale hunting in the 10th century have already been a (group) commercial business. Ottar's unbelievable whaling result surpassed much more than the amount of the single or a few farmstead could consume (though it is clear that we cannot take the number he caught as narrated in the description at face value), and the teacher mentions the great profit that the group whaling (with several boats) could yield.

Ælfric's text also presuppose that even the young English monks in the monastery probably had heard about many fishes and sea animals, including whales and dolphins.

Ælfric also warns us about the possible danger of whaling, however, so if OP had only insufficient equipment for fishing/ whaling and see whales on their way to the land, it would probably wise to leave them in peace.

+++

What superstitions might a peaceful Dane attach to them?

The closest evidence we have is from 13th century Norway, so it was written more than 2 centuries later than OP had allegedly lived (as well as the Christianization of Scandinavia) that we have some uncertainty about to what extent the lore of whales narrated in the text could date back further to the 10th century, the transition period from pre-Christian polytheism to Christianity.

The Old Norwegian text in question is called King's Mirror, a pedagogic text originally written for the education of princes in the royal court in the middle of the 13th century. This text mention about a dozen of whales and dolphins in the ocean near Iceland and Greenland, so I pick up some of them (and related lore) below (Larson trans. 1917: 119-24):

  • "hog whale": exceptionally cannot be eaten due to their special nature of the fat.
  • "Fish driver" (Sei whale?): the most useful of all to men; it drives the herring and all other kind of fishes to the land, as if sent by the God. They also behave how to spare both ship and men......'no one is permitted to catch to harm them, since they are of such great and constant service to men'
  • the right whale (bowhead): 'Sea-faring men fear it very much, for it is by nature deposed to sport with ships'.
  • "horse whale/ red comb" (not identified with certainty): very voracious , malicious and never grow tired of slaying men.
  • Rorqual: best of all for food, peaceful, sperm is a remedy for eye troubles, leprosy, ague, headache and other illness.

References:

  • Larson, Laurence M. (trans.). The King's Mirror: Translated from the Old Norse with Introduction and Notes. New York: Twayne, 1917.

+++

  • Nordeide, Sæbjørg W. & Kevin Edwards. The Vikings. Kalamazoo, MI: Arc Humanities, 2019.
  • Szabo, Vicki. 'Subsistence Whaling and the Norse Diaspora: Norsemen, Basques, and Whale Use in the Western North Atlantic, Ca. AD 900-1640'. In: Studies in the Medieval Atlantic, ed. Benjamin Hudson, pp. 65-99. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012.