I was told in high school by my history teacher that this movie was described by actual D-Day veterans as the most accurate representation of the events of that day that had ever been made into a film. What I don't understand is why they would launch those boats that open from the front onto a beach that was so heavily protected by belt fed machine guns and concrete bunkers. Why wouldn't they have carpet bombed the entire area before hand? Did the boats need to open from the front? Why in God's name would they attempt a frontal assault in a beach so heavily guarded?
Edit: Spelling and slight clarification.
this movie was described by actual D-Day veterans as the most accurate representation of the events of that day that had ever been made into a film.
I've heard similar such statements before. If the veterans who were there say that Saving Private Ryan got it right, that's the end of it. We may discuss the inevitable myriad flaws of a movie versus reality, but personally I think that's just pointless nitpicking to no real effect. The problem here is that we then have to grapple with the 'Omaha Monolith', my personal label for a series of myths that generally arise around the pop-cultural knowledge of the 1944 June 6 landings, which unfortunately SPR is at the epicentre of.
The problem of the Omaha Monolith is not so much the movie itself, but in people thinking that the experience of Omaha was consistent across all five landing beaches. This is most assuredly not the case, as we will demonstrate in the posts below, as just about every aspect of Operation Overlord has been asked about on this sub previously.
First, Omaha Beach as portrayed in Saving Private Ryan is only one beach out of five, and it was the bloodiest and hard-fought of all five. The other four beaches were a lot less of a slog, especially Utah Beach. The US got both the easiest and hardest beaches of the attack, with the other three beaches going in between. More in these posts:
More replies below.