Would we have seen more centralized power structures in Scandinavia without the christianization of the region? From a cursory glance, it seems the two are related phenomena even if the relationship isn't necessarily one of cause and effect.
I hope some of the following previous posts of mine might at least partly satisfy OP's curiosity:
Would we have seen more centralized power structures in Scandinavia without the christianization of the region?
It would be not impossible to build such a temporal political dominion for non-Christian Scandinavian rulers, as was the case with King Gudfred (d. 810) of the Danes who fought against the Carolingian Franks and apparently extended his political influence up to the Oslo fjord in the beginning of the 9th century, but, as suggested in OP above, the missionaries, church organization, and the administrative literacy represented by the Christian clergy was indeed useful tools to establish more powerful 'overlordship' toward neighboring less powerful rulers as well as to build more stable rule in the kingdom.