I read a book on the tenth legion as a teenager (15-20 years ago) and a statement in it about Roman soldiers pay has always stuck with me. The book stated that a soldiers salary banding never increased over 100+ years. Due to the fact that the costs of goods never really rose from one year to the next. The example the book used was that if a harvest was reasonable, a loaf of bread cost the same one day as it did a generation later.
Was this true?? If it was why, what was different about the Roman economy to mean inflation wasn’t really a thing??
Roman soldiers “pay” may be described thus: “Monetary compensation” + “booty”.
As described by u/Celebreth :
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/3bdppz/how_was_war_loot_split_amongst_armies_in_the/
How certain are you that lack of inflation was specifically mentioned?
“Toward the close of the third century A.D., no part of the Roman Empire had escaped the ravages of war, the plague, inflation” Page 497 Ancient History, Haynes/Hanscom