Hi, so my mother recommended “A Case for Christ,” by Lee Strobel and I was wondering what his reputation was among historians. I’m currently in my senior year of my undergrad, and hoping for law school and I’ve taken the LSAT. Yet I’ve already noticed he commits logical fallacies quite often and I was wondering if he has criticism within the historian community.
While you're waiting for a more specific answer, here are the FAQ responses on the general historicity of Jesus, by /u/talondearg, /u/jasoncaspian, and /u/kookingpot.