For a project I'm looking for cases in which anthropologists and ethnologists commit scientistic fallacies in their studies regarding Native Americans in the 19th century.
Something that would work would be e.g. if someone were to measure the size of someone's skull and then say that due to specific measurements, this person must be very aggressive or friendly, etc.
I'm currently working my way through S.G. Morton's Crania Americana and this is very close, but I'm struggling finding what I'm looking for. The appendix written by George Combe is closer, with examples of physiognomy; the latter's A System of Phrenology also works.
I'm not asking anyone to do my homework, I'm looking for more sources that do this.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Have you looked at George Stocking's Victorian Anthropology? It's sort of the best source for all things of this nature, and can point you to other possible sources. He does a great job of contextualizing many different approaches to "native" studies being done at this time period.
Hi - we as mods have approved this thread, because while this is a homework question, it is asking for clarification or resources, rather than the answer itself, which is fine according to our rules. This policy is further explained in this Rules Roundtable thread and this META Thread.
As a result, we'd also like to remind potential answerers to follow our rules on homework - please make sure that your answers focus appropriately on clarifications and detailing the resources that OP could be using.
Additionally, while users may be able to help you out with specifics relating to your question, we also have plenty of information on /r/AskHistorians on how to find and understand good sources in general. For instance, please check out our six-part series, "Finding and Understanding Sources", which has a wealth of information that may be useful for finding and understanding information for your essay.