I feel like we get questions like fairly frequently, but the best place I can point to is u/CrankyFederalist's answer from last year:
Very briefly, no, there was no contradiction at all. Status as a citizen was far more important than living in Rome, which was after all just a city. After the 4th/5th centuries it wasn't even the capital or economic centre of the western empire. Both the western and eastern halves of the empire were simply where Roman citizens lived.