Battle of Tours is one of those rare well documented battles from the 8th century that is traditionally called the battle where the spread of Islam, nay, the wholesale Islamic conquest of Europe was stopped, while revisionist arguments suggest that it was merely a medium-sized Umayyad raiding party being stopped by Franks on the way back without even having siege weapons or as large an army as possible that would be warranted by an invasion of France. I was wondering if there is a consensus one way or the other, or in between, regarding the provable significance of the Battle of Tours in the immediate aftermath. Considering the Umayyads were shattered by other Muslims less than 2 decades after, being reduced to an Iberian rump state, and also considering that Muslim incursions into France including Muslim-occupied fortifications remained since after the time of Otto the Great, one wonders to what degree the traditional account of this dark age Battle of Stalingrad (itself another "turning point" where describing it as such is probably bad history but I digress) where the fate of Europe was decided.

Edit:

Two things occurred to me that I should add.

1. I'm aware that the failed siege of Constantinople was more relevant.
2. I've read these two previous answers and was simply wondering if there was more to it.

Edit 2: I've read all answers provided by Google on here to similar questions, so leaving this up in case deleting your questions is a faux pas here and in case someone has something to add, as various answers have had some interesting addition to the same general narrative.