This is pretty straightforward: No.

The story OP is referring to actually did not occur on June 6, 1944. It happened on June 15 as Allied forces proceeded further inland from the landing areas at Normandy. USS Texas was part of the invasion fleet that was on hand to provide naval gunfire support for the landings. On June 15, the Allies had moved inland a bit. The American 1st Army requested gunfire support in the area between Insigny and Carentan. The target was just a bit out of range of Texas' main guns, at greater than 20,000 yards (more than 11 miles). Captain ​Charles Baker ordered the starboard (right side) torpedo blister flooded to tilt the ship two degrees, giving the main guns the elevation needed to be able to provide gunfire support. A torpedo blister is on the outer part of the hull, and usually includes a void inside of it. The torpedo blister can be hit (by a torpedo) and flooded without doing serious harm to anything that could damage the ship's ability to maneuver and fight.

Texas received a Battle Star for its support of the Normandy invasion in June of 1944, but that would have been standard. Texas received five battle stars during the war, and it received the same award for its support of other invasions before and after Normandy.

Captain Baker himself received a Silver Star for his leadership during the Normandy campaign, but his medal citation does not mention June 15. It does mention the ship's actions on June 6 and June 25, when it came under fire from enemy shore batteries. The story of Texas on D-Day itself actually gets a bit hairy, with enemy shells straddling the ship before scoring several hits. Texas took fire from shore once again on June 25, though she was fortunate to only suffer a handful of casualties. If another officer or crewman received special recognition for flooding the torpedo blister on June 15, I am unaware of it. In the accounts I have read, the decision to flood the torpedo blister is always attributed to Captain Baker.

While there are some breathless retellings of USS Texas on June 15 that would have you believe it was one of the most dramatic moments of the invasion, that is misleading. Texas' own report gives the incident one sentence of mention, which is probably more appropriate. It would not have been typical to flood the torpedo blisters to deliver fire, but it wasn't unheard of. Using the ship's pumps to generate a modest list was unusual but not dangerous or alarming. Texas, of course, still exists as a museum ship today and has had trouble with flooding in recent years. You can see what a slight one degree list looks like here.

It's a fun story to be sure, caused by an unusual set of circumstances. But it's not quite as dramatic as some make it out to be.