I don’t want to say primitive here. Because they weren’t primitive. A Reddit or who commented on a precious similar post pointed that out to me.
However they were less government-y advanced I guess? Like the standard of the Americas was much smaller tribes. Not kingdoms like Europe or east Asia. There were empires of course, but they weren’t the norm like kingdoms in Europe were.
So what caused this change? Lots of the Americas have great geography for building civilizations. Why didn’t they develop similarly to Europe and Asia?
Speaking as a moderator, we do not appreciate it when you delete questions you've asked as it then prevents others from seeing the provided answers. So please don't do that.
As for your question, I saw your first one and I am glad to see you've changed your tune about my people's "primitiveness." Perhaps you will be interested in the following answers of mine that demonstrate our advanced "government-y" nature:
Why did the US government sign treaties with the Native tribes instead of just fully conquering them? - On why the U.S. was not able to outright conquer Indian Tribes due to our military strength.
During pre Christopher Columbus time did the people of Mexico ever have ANY interaction with Native Americans? - On the existence of vast trade networks.
Native Americans in what is now the USA have often been portrayed as having "idyllic" lives before Western colonizers arrived - is there any truth to this? How much "easier" were their daily lives? Before Western diseases and colonists arrived, was it a life of easy hunting and simple living? - A four-part answer on various Indian government structures, warfare practices, religious freedom, and criminal justice.
Is there a recognized "Native American" philosophy, similar to how Western thought and Eastern thought is generalized? - On the recognition of our own philosophical structures.
Why did no "Cradle of Civilization" develop in North America? (Modern Day Canada & US) - On the existence of large Indigenous civilizations that are concluded to have been sustained by significant social and political organization.
Was sovereignty a part of Native American political thought? - On the prevalence of the concept of political sovereignty and organized governance among Tribes.
What Native American tribe(s) was the most powerful as the colonists started settling into the New World? (1600s-1700s) - On the likely influence that the Iroquoian governmental structure had on the formation of the United States and the Constitution.
I hope these can answer your question and demonstrate that Native American Tribes in North America were much more "advanced" than people like to give us credit for. Things weren't "less" of anything. They were just different.