Some ancient Roman and Greek statues portray men as extremely fit with physiques that can be hard to obtain even today. Were such physiques common, or even attainable back then?

by Nederlandmooi

The statue that begged this question is the Farnese Hercules, as such a body would be hard to obtain even with todays knowledge about fitness and nutrition. Bodies such as portrayed in the [Discus Thrower](https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/discobolos-de- discuspottenbakker-rome-itali%C3%AB-89077360.jpg) seem far more believable to me because he seems far leaner and less muscular, which is something I can imagine a reasonably fit man obtaining without very specific resistance training and diet. My question therefore mainly focusses on the kind of body we today associate with bodybuilding, lifting and the fitness community in general.

reproachableknight

This is a question that comes up on this forum a lot. Everyone seems to want to know whether ancient Greek and Roman men really were as jacked as some classical statues and modern popular media make them out to be. Well, here's a selection of some of our best answers.

u/Iphikrates answered the question https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/5hcclh/did_socrates_even_lift/

u/Iphikrates also answered https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/46guc3/gym_rat_here_how_ripped_did_ancient_greeks_get/d054pdh/

u/Bacarruda answered https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/a6fobc/how_were_gladiators_is_the_past_so_buff_what_kind/

Broke22