As a spanish man who never trusted the black legend of the Empire, I have faced serious troubles when trying to write a book about the "revolution of 1820". And since i have critical thinking and i don't want to address the topic from a flawed perspective, i do no longer know which words should i use to describe certain events.
First of all, genocide. This word is problematic in my opinion to describe the early relationships between the conquerors and the natives because as far as i know, there was never a will from the public institutions to kill civilians and most of the deaths that occurred after the arrival were caused by diseases. Nonetheless... Colón. That happened. And i cannot simply ignore it. So... Is it a genocide when a public authority acts against the will of the government (in this case the monarchs) to commit a massacre even tho he was punished because of it? Can i really talk seriously about genocide on this regard?
Second of all, everything related with the word colonial. If natives had the same legal status as those who were born in the metropoli, and those who went there had childs with the natives, is it possible to talk about colonial population? And if the territories spent within their soil most of the resources that were extracted from there, can i really talk about colonies? Being fair, the virreinatos were not even considered different countries, and they did not have more differences among them back then than the ones that Spanish historic nationalities had among themselves.
Third of all... The word in spanish is expolio. I don't know how to say that in english but it means something like robbery or so. And linking it with the last question, in which i claimed that most of the resources were spent there, is it possible to speak about expolio when most of the resources that were subtracted from them were stolen due to corruption of peninsular authorities? This is specially hard to gasp for me because even tho most latin american countries claim that there was indeed, robbery, Catalonians say the same about the central government of Spain nowadays. Even those who live in the capital claim that Spain is stealing their money. So... When everyone is spanish but everyone thinks that the spanish people are stealing their money, can i really talk about robbery?
Hello. It appears that your post has a mistaken assumption relating to the American Indian Genocide(s) that occurred in the Americas. This topic is often controversial and can lead to inaccurate information. This message is not intended to provide you with all of the answers, but simply to address some of the basic facts, as well as genocide denialism in this regard, and provide a short list of introductory reading. Because this topic covers a large area of study, the actions of the United States will be highlighted. There is always more that can be said, but we hope this is a good starting point for you.
##What is Genocide?
Since the conceptualization of the act of genocide, scholars have developed a variety of frameworks to evaluate instances that may be considered genocide. One of the more common frameworks is the definition and criteria implemented by the United Nations. The term "genocide," as coined by Raphael Lemkin in 1943, was defined by the U.N. in 1948. The use of this term was further elaborated by the genocide convention.
Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:
Article II: In the present convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such:
##American Indian Genocides – Did they happen?
Since the arrival of Europeans to the Americas, typically signaled with the appearance of Columbus in 1492, Indigenous Peoples have experienced systematic oppression and extermination at the hands of colonial powers. These colonizing governments either organized or sponsored acts of genocide perpetrated by settlers, targeting Indigenous settlements for complete destruction; eliminating sources of food and access to life-sustaining resources; instituting child separation policies; and forcefully relocating Indigenous populations to often times inhospitable tracts of land, now known as “reservations.” All of these acts constitute what scholars now recognize as genocide. The horrendous acts that occurred in the Americas were even an example proposed by Lemkin himself, where it is noted from his writings:
These actions took place over the entirety of the Americas, exacerbating the rapid depopulation of Indigenous Nations and communities. Exact figures of the population decline are inconclusive, giving us only estimates at best, with Pre-Columbian population numbers ranging anywhere from as low as 8 million to as high as ~100 million inhabitants across North, Central, and South America. What we do know is that in the United States, records indicate the American Indian population had dropped to approximately 250,000 by 1900. Despite any debate about population statistics, the historical records and narratives conclude that, at least according to the U.N. definition, genocide was committed.
##Mental Element: Establishing Intent
In order for genocide to be committed, there must be reasonable evidence to establish an intent to commit what constitutes genocide. Through both word and action, we can see that colonial powers, such as the United States, did intend at times to exterminate American Indian populations, often with public support. Government officials, journalists, scholars, and public figures echoed societal sentiments regarding their desire to destroy Indians, either in reference to specific groups or the whole race.
”This unfortunate race, whom we had been taking so much pains to save and to civilize, have by their unexpected desertion and ferocious barbarities justified extermination and now await our decision on their fate.”
"That a war of extermination will continue to be waged between the races until the Indian race becomes extinct must be expected."
--California Governor Peter Burnett, 1851
". . .these Indians will in the end be exterminated. They must soon be crushed - they will be exterminated before the onward march of the white man."
--U.S. Senator John Weller, 1852, page 17, citation 92
##Physical Element: Acting with Purpose
U.S. Army Policy of Killing Buffalo (Criterion C)
In this post, it is explained how it was the intention and policy of the U.S. Army to kill the buffalo of America off in an attempt to subdue, and even exterminate, the Plains Indians.
Sterilization (Criterion D)
The Indian Health Service (IHS) is a federally run service for American Indians and Alaska Natives. It is responsible for providing proper health care for American Indians as established via the treaties and trust relationship between tribes and the U.S. Government. However, on November 6, 1976, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released the results of an investigation that concluded that between 1973 and 1976, IHS performed 3,406 sterilizations on Native American women. Per capita, this figure would be equivalent to sterilizing 452,000 non-Native American women. Many of these sterilizations were conducted without the consent of the women being sterilized or under coercion.
Boarding Schools (Criterion E)
The systematic removal of Indian children from their parents and placement into boarding schools was a policy implemented by the United States meant to force American Indian children to assimilate into American culture, thus “[killing] the Indian, [and saving] the man.” These schools were operated by various entities, including the federal government and church/missionary organizations. While constituting cultural genocide as well, American Indian children were beaten, neglected, and barred from practicing their cultures. Some children even died at these schools.
##But What About the Diseases?
In the United States, a subtle state of denial exists regarding portions of this country's history. One of the biggest issues concerning the colonization of the Americas is whether or not this genocide was committed by the incoming colonists. And while the finer points of this subject are still being discussed, few academics would deny that acts of genocide were committed. However, there are those who vehemently attempt to refute conclusions made by experts and assert that no genocide occurred. These “methods of denialism” are important to recognize to avoid being manipulated by those who would see the historical narratives change for the worse.
One of the primary methods of denial is the over severity of diseases introduced into the Americas after the arrival of the colonizers, effectively turning these diseases into ethopoeic scapegoats responsible for the deaths of Indigenous Peoples. While it is true that disease was a huge component of the depopulation of the Americas, often resulting in up to a 95% mortality rate for many communities and meaning some communities endured more deaths from disease, these effects were greatly exacerbated by actions of colonization.
##Further Reading
Though there is much information about this topic, this introductory list of books and resources provide ample evidence to attest the information presented here: