How much of a return on investments would traders who travelled to Asia in the 17th Century expect?

by sonny1993

I'm sure it varies wildly depending on context, but in general I can imagine investing in long distance trade between Europe and the eastern indies in the 17th Century would have been extremely costly and risky, since it took a lot of time to travel around Africa and the possibility of a shipwreck was very real.
So, as a very general ballpark, how much would an investor expect to gain from such an investment to make it worth the risk? Would it be 120% of the gold they spent? 200%? 1000%? Does it even make sense to pose the question in these terms, or were their economic systems too different to compare?

Sjoerder

You may also be interested in How was Da Gama's trade route profitable?, with an answer by /u/mormengil.