Im doing an exam about the ideology and reasoning of the Khmer Rouge, particularily Pol Pot. Also any information regarding foreign entanglements by the tripolar powers which were ideologically contradictory, such as the Western support for the Syngman Rhee dictatorship.
Ideological foundations are explained by different historians in different ways, but all of the 'big' works on the subject do this.
Kiernan suggests that it was predominantly a racialist style of thinking that produced certain ideological quirks, expanded upon to include fetishization of agrarianism, cults of antiquity and territorial expansion in his book Blood and Soil.
Short suggests revolutionary influence from French-colonial education, marxism-leninism-maoism-stalinism, as well as the particulars of theravada buddhism, a combination of all these may have been the primary influence on the CPK and Pol Pot.
Someone like Henri Locard in his collection of Khmer Rouge slogans also spells out the influence of Maoism and revolutionary thinking, which might be a handy resource for something like an exam. Easy to quote slogans and they are fairly explicit in their ideological underpinnings eg "with the Angka we will have a great leap forward a super great leap forward".
Hinton is another good historian for explaining the why... his book 'why did they kill?' and the essay's which formed it's foundation (that can be found on JSTOR I'm pretty sure) give a good look into the kind of psyche behind it.
For me, and as I've probably said in numerous answers I've made here on the topic, I generally go with the Philip Short style explanation - particularly if you are going to be talking about Pol Pot in particular. The biography he wrote, Pol Pot: History of a Nightmare is, in my view, one of the best books written on the subject.
Hi - we as mods have approved this thread, because while this is a homework question, it is asking for clarification or resources, rather than the answer itself, which is fine according to our rules. This policy is further explained in this Rules Roundtable thread and this META Thread.
As a result, we'd also like to remind potential answerers to follow our rules on homework - please make sure that your answers focus appropriately on clarifications and detailing the resources that OP could be using.
Additionally, while users may be able to help you out with specifics relating to your question, we also have plenty of information on /r/AskHistorians on how to find and understand good sources in general. For instance, please check out our six-part series, "Finding and Understanding Sources", which has a wealth of information that may be useful for finding and understanding information for your essay.