Is the Medieval Water Myth unique to European/Eurocentric history?

by shackleton__

The inimitable /u/DanKensington has some great posts debunking the myth that "medieval people mostly drank alcohol because of water contamination". I pretty much always see this referenced to Europe, especially western Europe, and sometimes colonial America (despite being definitely non-medieval...). Is this myth exclusive to popular misconceptions of European history, or do laypeople in other parts of the world also have similar myths about their own history?

Also, where did the myth originate? Is there a particular author or historian to whom we can attribute the original idea?

hiroto98

The idea doesn't exist in Japan at least, one of the obvious reasons being that tea consumption grew greatly in popularity during the (Japanese) medieval era.

Tea was first introduced to Japan from China most probably in the 8th century. From that point, the popularity of tea drinking and tea cultivation spread first throughout the wealthy classes, and then later became a common drink for everyone in the early modern period.

Japanese tea is not necessarily made with boiling water, and so the sterilizing effect of heating the water is seperated from the image of the issue at hand. Pouring the water over the tea leaves also doesn't do much in the way of purifying bad water, and so it can be established that using bad water to make tea is a good way to get sick.

The widespread popularity of tea (and the fact that modern people are aware of that popularity) therefore prevents the belief that people couldn't drink water because it was dirty, for if the water were dirty people also wouldn't be drinking tea.

There are numerous other factors preventing such a myth from taking hold as well, for example that poor farmers were known as Mizu-nomi Byakusho, literally water drinking peasants, which identifies them as worse off than peasants who drank tea (or alcohol) with their meals.

A very basic knowledge of history would thus provide one with the ability to reject such a myth if it were to be brought up.

Edit: A few alterations to make it easier to understand