You may want to ask /r/askphilosophy on this instead of here.

Chinese philosophy didn't have one single character who played as important of a role as Plato did in the western tradition. No single Chiense philosopher was as prolific in their writing as Plato in the same period and few had the breadth as Plato in terms of the areas of philosophy covered. What was the overhwleming concern of Chinese philosophers in the Axial Age was governance, political philosophy, and philosophy of life. While they also touched on other topics like epistomology and ontology it really wasn't until the Han Dynasty that new areas of thought were being explored in full.

The one figure that everyone probably knows from the Chinese tradition, Kongzi or Confucious, while matching Plato in fame doesn't hold the same position he does. Since Kongzi himself never wrote any works aside from one text, the Spring and Autumn Annals, that may be attributed to him that is a history or as the tradition takes it a cryptic commentary on morality. The analects of his disciples is well studied like Plato but its a collection of very pithy sayings and not drawn out arguments on various areas of philosophy like Plato. Based on the analects we can see Kongzi had a system of thought on morality, self cultivation, politics, culture, but not things like epistomology, metaphysics, logic, etc. that Plato also touches on.

The same goes for the other big names of the time Laozi, Zhuangzi, Hanfei, etc. they simply don't cover the ground Plato does. This doesn't even cover the later reception of Buddhism which transformed philosophy in China.

If you are interested in Chinese philosophy I would recommend a look at Feng Youlan's History of Chinese Philosophy. He covers most of the important thinkers and you can get am understanding of how early Chinese thought was and how it shaped the later tradition.