Assuming you're asking about the assertion Nikole Hannah-Jones made in the New York Times Magazine's 1619 project, it's true in part but not in whole. There were certainly southern enslavers who joined the Patriot cause as a means to preserve slavery, or because they were worried that the Regular soldiers would arm enslaved people and use them as troops (which they did at times). However, Hannah-Jones probably did overstate the preservation of slavery as a major cause for the Revolution; it's complicated, and reasonable people can disagree over what "really" happened, but even scholarship from when I was in graduate school, in another century, cites fear among enslavers that their enslaved persons would be turned against them as a revolutionary motivation in Virginia and the Carolinas.
More reading on this can be found:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/czl900/a_piece_from_the_new_york_times_1619_project/
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/inonct/how_accurate_is_the_1619_project/
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/pqp4go/what_do_historians_think_of_the_1619_project/
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/eev0o0/is_the_1619_project_from_the_new_york_times/
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/i6wfuw/how_veracious_is_the_1619_project/