In a sentence, the rapid development of field artillery and new infantry tactics using combined pike-and-short formations made the use of wagon forts obsolete in Western and Central Europe by the early 1600s.

In the case of the Hussites specificially, much of their initial success was from a mixture of first-mover advantage, and from their opponents over-reliance on lancer heavy cavalry.

More broadly, the Hussite tactics of using armored wagon as movable fieldworks from which arquebusers could be protected from, and fire upon, enemy cavalry, was independently invented, if not imitated, by early modern Russian military forces of the 15th to 17th centuries, in the form of the gulay-gorod (lit. "walking walls"). This was a type of mobile fortification that is better documented and saw a longer "service life" than the hussite wagon forts. The gulay-gorod was a valuable tactic used in wars by the forces of the Russian Tzardom in multiple wars against both the PLC and the Kazan Khanate. Like Hussite War Wagons, this tactic allowed smaller number of musket-armed infantry to be protected without need for the training and supply of large number of pike infantry as well.

Despite their successful use in the 1500s and early 1600s, but by the 1670s and 1680s, the profileration of field artilery, made use of tabor or gulay-gorod less and less common in by Russian forces, although they continued to be used by cossack militias and forces on the eastern fronteir into the early 18th century.

Similarly, wagon forts (wagonburg) tactics were used in the 1600s and 1700s by such other contemporary Middle-Asian powers such as the Ottoman, Safavids, and Mughals. And simialrly to in Central Europe , they were a successful tactic in the 1500s and early 1600s, but dropped out of use in by the early 18th century, likely similarly due to improvements in infantry tactics and most especially field artiliary.

SOURCES AND FURTHER READING:

This answer is largely summarized from "Guliai-gorod, Wagenburg, and Tabor Tactics in 16th–17th Century Muscovy and Eastern Europe", published in 2012 by Brian Davies in the edited volume Warfare in Eastern Europe, 1500-1800.

Here's a pop-hist article that discusses the use of wagonburg by the Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals, but I'm not sure how accurate it really is: https://www.medievalists.net/2019/01/wagenberg-war-wagons/

For understanding the relationship between technology, logistics, and economics in the development firearms technology in the late medivial and early modern period, I cannot reccomend enough Firearms: A Global History to 1700 by Kenneth Chase