This week I reviewed The Agincourt Campaign of 1415: The Retinues of the Dukes of Clarence and Gloucester by Michael P. Warner, as usual the original write up (plus other reviews!) is on my blog at https://www.stuartellisgorman.com/blog/the-agincourt-retinues-of-the-dukes but I've also copied the full text below.

​

The research on the prosopography of English armies during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries is easily one of the most fascinating and rewarding bodies of historical research of the last twenty years. Pioneered by scholars like Andrew Ayton, Adrian Bell, and Anne Curry, this work has now been taken up by many more researchers and expanded beyond what the three of them could have managed on their own. Michael P. Warner’s book examines the Agincourt campaign through the lens of the retinues of King Henry V’s younger brothers. This is very much a work of academic scholarship that is in conversation with a wider pool of research, not an introductory book. That said, it is also remarkably approachable for a book of this kind and while an awareness of the work of Ayton, Bell, and Curry will assist anyone who wishes to read it, having actually read everything that came before is not a requirement.

For those unfamiliar with the concept, prosopography is the collective study of the lives of a group of people whose individual biographies are insufficiently attested in surviving evidence to be able to study them on their own. In the specific case of these projects, it is taking the available evidence about who participated in English wars during the Hundred Years War and trying to generate an overall picture of what it meant to be a semi-professional soldier during that time. Arguably the most impressive project to come out of this work, and the foundation of much of what has come after, is the Medieval Soldier Database (https://www.medievalsoldier.org/) which compiles vast lists of names of individuals known to have served in English armies from 1369 until 1453. It’s a hugely impressive piece of work, and freely available for anyone with an interest in doing some digging.

Two major threads have emerged as a result of these prosopographical studies. The first is a greater insight into the lives of individuals who served in the Hundred Years War – linking their wartime lives to when they may have appeared in court cases or other documents of medieval English bureaucracy. The other fruitful area of study has been in gaining a greater understanding of how English armies were recruited during this time. By tracking which names appear in the retinues of captains and sub-captains it is possible to see patterns on how often soldiers served together, how stable retinues were during different periods, and generally to gain greater insight into how medieval armies were assembled. These studies bring us much closer to answering the question of how someone like King Henry V would actually find people to bring with him on his invasion of France – convincing his nobles is one thing but getting the archers to show up is another!

Michael P. Warner’s books is a great addition to this field of study, taking full advantage of the Medieval Soldier Database and the research that has come before to create a much more in-depth picture of two of the largest English retinues sent to France in 1415 than anything that has come before. The Dukes of Clarence and Gloucester are a well-chosen pair for this study. Both were younger brothers of Henry V, and thus the premier retinues to serve in after the king’s own, but they had very different levels of military experience. Clarence was a hardened veteran of several campaigns – arguably more experienced even than his elder brother – and Warner shows how he already had a well-established network of associated he could recruit his retinue from. In contrast, Gloucester was untested in war and had to assemble his retinue from scratch – relying more on retainers who had long established links with the House of Lancaster generally rather than with Gloucester as a whole. Gloucester’s retinue also included many individuals who had no previous military experience while Clarence was better able to recruit hardened veterans, once again reflecting their own previous experience.

The book is not solely concerned with the 1415 campaign. Clarence’s pre-1415 military experience is explored in detail as well as his campaigns after 1415 up until his early death at the Battle of Baugé in 1421. The surviving muster evidence is thin in places due to a low survival rate for Clarence’s non-1415 documents, but Warner does an admirable job of piecing together what evidence he does have. Gloucester lived a much longer, and at time more controversial, life that included some more military service but also a prominent role in English governance. This allows Warner to trace members of Glouceser’s retinue not just into his later campaigns, but also through his role in administering his estates back in England and to his time in royal government during the minority of his nephew, King Henry VI. Warner even manages to link Gloucester’s likely assassination in 1447 to having at least involved, if not been directly caused by, someone who had served in his retinue all the way back in 1415.

This is a dense academic work, there’s no getting past that, so I probably wouldn’t recommend it for general readers. For a general history of the Battle of Agincourt, then either Great Battles: Agincourt or Agincourt: A New History, both by Anne Curry, would be better places to start. If this is your first dive into late medieval military prosopography, then The Soldier Experience in the Fourteenth Century edited by Adrian Bell and Anne Curry is probably the better starting point. However, if you have already dipped a toe into this area then Michael P. Warner’s book has a lot to offer, and you will not be disappointed by it!

Getting my question in early. I’m looking for books on two subjects. The first is early gunpowder weapons and their development in late medieval/Renaissance warfare, circa 15th-16th centuries, books don’t have to be within that time span exactly by any means though. The other subject is naval warfare in the 16th-17th centuries. I’m especially interested in the development of naval artillery. My thanks in advance.

What new or upcoming books are you all excited for?

Looking for books which cover Chechnya. A non biased book would be great. Some of the ones I got hold of are all written with an Anti Russia bias. Would be great if there are some non biased ones.

Could another user recommend an academic journal to me which has a large amount of content regarding Iron Age Scandinavia and Viking Age England?

Hi, any good popular books on Jewish philosophy? Thanks!

Bit of an obscure one, but wondering if anyone had any good recommendations on early Anglo-Saxon art and symbolism?

Hi! I'm looking for any books or articles relating to Progressive Era fashion in the Borderland (aka the border of the USA/Mexico; the El Paso-Juarez region would be doubly appreciated.) Thank you so much!

Any recommendations for broad histories of island Southeast Asia or the Malay world? Mostly focused on the modern area, I’d prefer something that doesn’t take the British/Dutch perspective as the standard. I liked Jonathan Spence’s range and scope in The Search for Modern China. The Andayas seem to be have quite a few prominent books, what’s the consensus on their work?

May I ask for audiobook recommendations for an ex-Hardcore History listener? I’ve so far tried Hitler’s American Friends by Brandon W. Hart and it’s just a little too dry for me, I’m really struggling to finish it.

Edit: I have found the booklist but I have no idea what to look for. I’ll have to think for a while about what topic I want to get into.

Does anyone have recommendations for accessing anarchist periodicals from the 1890s online? I'm writing a paper on the Homestead Strike of 1892 and am struggling to come across material that represents anarchist perspectives. Have found copies of the Egoist and Benjamin Tucker's Liberty on HathiTrust and am familiar with Berkman's autobiography and Goldman's writings, but beyond that have been coming up short!