I was talking recently about the famous autopsy of Charles II and checked the internet to find the full text, but couldn’t find it. And the more I looked, the more I started noticing the telltale signs of apocrypha: it makes for a great fun fact, most people use almost the exact same wording for things, and the few people who are citing sources seem to be citing just a few papers written very recently (relative to the actual event). But while I couldn’t find primary sources for the autopsy, I also couldn’t find people talking about how the story isn’t actually true and it was made up.
So I suspect that this story is made up, but I don’t have any guidance for that from people who actually study history. Thus, my problem: my process for finding primary sources is usually to find experts who know how to find them, and checking their sources. But that obviously can’t help me here. I want to be able to say one way or the other that this autopsy report is real or fake, but I don’t have any clue how to check that for myself. I recognize that my question kind of boils down to “how do you do research,” but I was hoping I could get some kind of guidance.
More can be said about the specifics of research, you may be interested in The physician in the autopsy of Charles II gave some very... colorful (if not medically impossible) descriptions like "heart the size of a peppercorn" and "did not contain a single drop of blood." What was going on in these autopsies? written by u/BedsideRounds