Why does pre-renaissance European Art look unrealistic?

by blangenie

I am a history teacher and was talking with a co-worker today about art history. She said to me that pre-Renaissance art was not depicted in a realistic way because there was a belief at the time that depicting the world realistically in art was seen as anti-christian.

Basically the logic goes something like, "if we depict the world as it is we are trying to be like God and that's not our place".

My understanding of the shift of art from the middle ages to the Renaissance has been that there were developments in painting practices/technologies that enabled more realistic painting. (For example the inclusion of 3 point perspective)

My question is, to what extent was the "unrealistic" art of the middle ages a result of religious ideas vs the development of new artistic techniques or "technologies"?

postal-history

The best previous answer can be found here:

Why did pre-renaissance christian art degrade so much compared to the classical period? by /u/Guckfuchs

Short answer is that painting technologies were already available in the Roman period but were purposefully abandoned; however we dont have textual evidence as for why that abandonment happened