Why did the Unionists fight to prevent the confederacy from leaving in the American Civil War?

by ceffyl_gwyn

I listen to a history podcast run by two popular British historians. They're in the midst of a four-parter on the American civil war, with a leading (British) historian of the subject as a guest.

The question that seems to have stumped all three of them is why, after the confederacy announce they're leaving, the North decide to take up arms to force them to stay rather than just letting them go off on their way, presumably to collapse economically in a decade or two and either petition to rejoin or be mopped up then. What is your understanding of why this happened?

I'm not doing full justice to what they say, which can be found here: https://play.acast.com/s/the-rest-is-history-podcast

Gankom

There's always more that can be said but this is a fairly popular subject and we have a bunch on it in our American Civil War FAQ. In particular I'll recomend;

/u/Georgy_K_Zhukov writing in Why was there a Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?

/u/Borimi on Causes of the American Civil War?

For some related background you can check out /u/turtleeatingalderman on Did the framers of the U.S. Constitution discuss whether it should be possible for states to secede?.