Beyond the Spartan Mirage: how dominant is the view of Sparta put forward by Hodgkinson and Powell?

by allthejokesareblue

I was having an interesting discussion a while ago on Reddit about Brett Devereaux's This. Isn't. Sparta., which (I think) follows the argument put forward by Ollier in The Spartan Mirage: that Sparta was unusual amongst Greek poleis, in that it was unusually cruel, authoritarian and socially stratified.

I was told by someone who seemed to know that this view of Sparta as being unusual is now completely put of date and that modern historiography, led by works by Hodgkinson and Powell such as Beyond the Mirage present Sparta as much more alike other poleis in their social and political structure than unlike, and that contemporary accounts of what Sparta was like are fairly untrustworthy.

They seemed to be of the view that this was now the dominant school of modern historiography, but it was also clearly their view, so I wanted to ask a broader field how much of the older "Spartan Mirage" remains?

DanKensington

This subreddit in general, and u/Iphikrates in particular, happen to be one of the foremost voices dispelling the Spartan Mirage - to the point where Stephen Hodkinson himself included our foremost thread on that matter in one of his lectures. Here is the thread in question; I also commend to your attention Iphikrates' flair profile, which has a subsection specifically dedicated to Sparta.